Solutions · NDIS & disability support providers· Brisbane & SEQ
Documentation that keeps up with the roster. Drafted, human-checked, consistent.
Shift notes become progress notes; months of notes become plan-review evidence; incidents get written up inside the window. Every document reviewed by your team before it enters the record.
Type five lines about the job. Get back the finished document, priced from your list, in your voice, ready to send after you approve it.
Sound familiar?
Support work generates documentation faster than anyone rostered can write it.
The plan-review evidence report means someone reads six months of notes and writes for two days.
Every staff departure resets documentation quality to zero.
Scope & privacy: read this first
Built for this sector's obligations: uploaded documents are deleted within 24 hours of processing, nothing is ever used to train AI models, and every document is an internal draft until your staff review it. It drafts records and correspondence only: never clinical judgments, never decisions about participants, never anything submitted without a human. Use participant initials, not names.
Use case 01
From shift notes to plan-review evidence
Today
The documentation chain that funds the organisation (notes, progress reports, plan-review evidence) is written by your most senior people out of hours.
Instead
Raw shift notes become compliant, objective progress notes for staff review; months of notes assemble into the plan-review evidence report in your provider's structure. Days become an afternoon.
With the default assumptions shown here, that's worth $23,760 a year. Slide the numbers to yours.
Your numbers: adjust them
Assumes review takes ~1.5 hrs/week each. That time goes back to supervision and participants, which is also what the Commission wants to see.
Use case 02
Incident reports inside the window
Today
Reportable incidents have clocks on them. At 11pm with the quality manager asleep, the write-up is exactly as good as whoever's on shift.
Instead
The facts go in; a structured draft in the right tone comes out, with missing required elements flagged [REQUIRED: ADD]. The responsible person verifies and submits. The obligations stay with a person; the blank page doesn't.
With the default assumptions shown here, that's worth $2,904 a year. Slide the numbers to yours.
Your numbers: adjust them
The real value is reports that are complete, on time and consistent when the Commission looks. That isn't a dollar figure.
Use case 03
Service agreements at exact published rates
Today
Agreements and schedules of supports must quote price limits exactly; a wrong rate is a compliance problem and a trust problem.
Instead
Your rates and price limits live in a table; every agreement quotes them exactly with the source shown. Plain-English terms from your own past agreements.
With the default assumptions shown here, that's worth $1,283 a year. Slide the numbers to yours.
Your numbers: adjust them
Assumes ~10 minutes of review each. Zero invented rates is the actual point.
The edge case
The new support worker's first shift notes
Staff turnover is the sector's documentation killer: every departure takes the house style with it, and every arrival writes like themselves.
The new worker's raw notes come out in the organisation's style from day one: objective, structured, consistent with three years of past notes. Quality stops living in individual heads, which is also exactly what an auditor wants to see.
How it starts
01
Send your price list and five documents you've written: quotes, reports, letters. That's the whole setup.
02
It learns them: your exact prices go into editable tables, your way of writing gets picked up, and your usual documents become one-click jobs.
03
Your first real document goes out the same day, drafted in minutes, reviewed and sent by you.
It drafts; you approve. Nothing is ever sent, signed or submitted without a person reviewing it first.
Fair questions
Is this appropriate for participant data?+
It's designed for the drafting layer, with hard boundaries: use initials rather than names, uploads are deleted within 24 hours, nothing trains AI models, and every document is reviewed by your staff before entering any record. It never makes clinical judgments or decisions about participants. That's built in, not optional. For organisations with stricter requirements, you can run generation on your own model provider agreement.
Does this replace our practice-management system?+
No. It writes the documents your practice-management system stores. Notes, reports and agreements are drafted here, reviewed by your team, and filed wherever they live today.
Does it send anything by itself?+
No, and it can't. Every document is a draft until a person approves it. Even connected email and calendar actions wait in an approvals inbox for a human click. That's how it's built, not a setting.
Who owns what we put in, and what happens to our price list?+
You do, outright. Uploaded documents are deleted within 24 hours of processing. Your price lists and reference documents sit in your own account, locked away from everyone else, downloadable at any time, and never used to train AI models. Cancel and you keep everything. Delete and it's gone immediately.
Ready-made for ndis & disability support providers.
The document types on this page come pre-built. Install them in one click and run them with your own prices and documents. Or have the whole thing set up for you by our rollout partner in a single session.